Friday, July 31, 2015

OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressions

Everyone's talking about the OnePlus 2 - the company calls it the '2016 flagship killer'. One of the main highlights of the device is the camera. It has a 13MP camera and the company claims that it can perform better than others, especially in low light. We wanted to put that to the test, as well give the optical image stabilisation and laser auto focus system a workout. Here are some results we've compiled over a couple of days of use.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis newly-made stone wall proved the perfect way to test the depth of field you can get with the f2.0 lens. A wider aperture lets in more light but also gives you a pleasing shallow depth of field.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis is a macro shot of a hand drawn illustration in charcoal - you can see the raised/embossed strokes clearly. Here too, the depth of field comes into play. Light from a single incandescent bulb.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis early morning photo of a newspaper shows the resolving power of the lens: it has 6 physical lenses and the results are impressive. Sunlight from a single window.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis photo of a toy motorcycle was taken in pitch darkness and the only sources of light are two small candles (tea lights). The large, 1.3m light-collecting pixels are working here to deliver a photo that is impressively low on noise.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis outdoor photo (taken just after noon) will show you how the OnePlus 2 camera captures colours. We increased the saturation on this one (in-phone) to better highlight them.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThe complicated textures and colours of this dilapidated fire hydrant cover are easily brought to the fore. Here again, the colour saturation has been increased and a vignette added to focus attention.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis image was in very low light - just street lamps! The detail on the pic indicates that it was captured at ISO 5017. Again, very impressive because the noise levels are kept very low. You can clearly see the white car's number plates.OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressionsThis photo on a busy street at night tested the laser autofocus system and optical image stabilisation. The shutter speed on this one (automatically selected) was just 1/14 sec - which explains why the fast moving traffic is blurry. However, the subject was captured very clearly and all numbers/stickers on the motorcycle are clear. This was ISO 938.

Overall, we came away impressed with the results from the OnePlus 2 camera. The only issues so far are that the camera is fairly slow (shutter lag - time between pressing the button and capturing the image). We expected it to be a lot faster. Hopefully, this can be fixed with software updates. Another complaint was that the stock camera app has barely any additional settings or functions. People who like to tinker with settings and vario us modes will be very disappointed. We had better experience with the Google Camera app and Open Camera.


Source: OnePlus 2 smartphone: Camera impressions

Thursday, July 30, 2015

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Primary Camera Specification Confirmed

The rumors and leaks surrounding the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ are boiling over as the release date nears. And a new report from India confirms key configuration details of the double-edge-display-clad Samsung smartphone.

According to the Zauba database, which keeps track of India's import/export activities, the rear-facing camera unit on the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ will be 16 MP. As reported, the database has entries of 16 MP camera units bundled with 1/2.6″ sensors, shipped to India from China. Samsung apparently imported 500 units of the sensors into India. Moreover, the price of each sensor unit is equivalent to $19, notes Phone Arena. The entries also confirm that the model number tied to the Edge device is SM-G928.

Technically, the imported 16 MP camera unit is same as the ones seen in the flagship Samsung Galaxy S6 and the double-edge-display variant Galaxy S6 Edge. This means the much-appreciated camera feature "OIS" will be part of the upcoming Galaxy S6 Edge+ device as well. Meanwhile, the release date of the Galaxy S6 Edge+ and the Galaxy Note 5 is expected to be on Aug. 13 in New York City at Samsung's "Unpacked" event.

The Galaxy S6 Edge+ will come with a 5.7-inch display, it is rumored, aided by 1,440 x 2,560 pixels QHD screen resolution. The smartphone will be powered by Samsung's Exynos 7420 processor. The icing on the cake, however, is the 4 GB of RAM unit, believed to be part of the device. Plus, Phone Arena says, the entire configuration will be backed by a huge 3,700 mAh battery unit. For memory, the device will come equipped with 32 GB of storage space, but without a microSD card slot. Samsung has not confirmed the Galaxy S6 Edge+ specifications thus far.


Source: Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Primary Camera Specification Confirmed

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Samsung sensor puts 16-megapixel cameras into slim phones

Wondering how Samsung manages to cram a 16-megapixel camera into seemingly wafer-thin phones like the Galaxy A8? By developing a brand-spanking new sensor that fits, that's how. The Korean company has built an ISOCELL-based CMOS imager that uses extremely tiny 1.0-micron pixels instead of the 1.12-micron units from the previous model. That may not sound like much of a difference, but it amounts to a sensor that's 20 percent thinner, at a scant 5mm (0.2 inches) deep. In short, you won't have to accept an unsightly camera hump just to get high-resolution shots.

There's going to be some compromises with this sensor. While ISOCELL is supposed to help offset the light reception lost by using smaller pixels, the camera just won't perform as well in dimly-lit environments as bigger sensors from Samsung or its rivals. Still, this is a big deal if you don't want to settle for low-res pictures in slim devices -- and it's not an exclusive, so you may see it pop up in other companies' phones before long.

Samsung's 1-micron camera sensor


Source: Samsung sensor puts 16-megapixel cameras into slim phones

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Will the OnePlus 2 make more expensive Android phones obsolete?

OnePlus launched its '2016 Flagship Killer', the OnePlus 2 today morning in the form of a virtual reality recording from its headquarters. As the event started, Carl Pei went through the thought process behind OnePlus 2, talked about the importance of the OnePlus community and ultimately unveiled the features of the phone – 5.5-inch full HD display, OxygenOS based on Android 5.1 OS, finger-print sensor, USB Type-C port, 3300mAh battery, 13MP rear camera with Optical Image Stabilisation and Laser AutoFocus and more.

But the price point of the phone Rs 22,999 for the 16GB model and Rs 24,999 for the 64GB model, is what has got everyone asking the question, 'How do I get one?' So much so, that #OnePlus2 has been trending on Twitter since today morning. And unlike most international brands, India is one of the launch countries for OnePlus 2.

CK98V3TUcAABfsj

CK98V3TUcAABfsj

OnePlus One already had us convinced that you can get high end features at a sensible price point. Also, since the launch of Xiaomi Mi 3 last year, phone makers have been pushing the envelope when it comes to pricing. Xiaomi's flagship phone – the Mi 4 is now selling at Rs 17,999 and the OnePlus One is selling for Rs 21,998 (we do not know if the One will be discontinued from August 11 yet). Both these phones have specs which are top-of-the-line. Makes us wonder, are the bigger established brands fleecing us on price?

Fluctuating prices

One of the most common comeback from big brands is the fact that they come out with 'quality' flagships that have 'premium build quality' and 'the best' features – and that justifies the premium. But if that is the case, why does the price not remain constant for a considerable period of time? A look at any e-commerce websites for flagship phones will show a different (in most cases lower) price than the launch MRP. We understand depreciation, but at such quick rates?

SamsungGalaxyS6

SamsungGalaxyS6

Take the example of Samsung, it launched its flagship Galaxy S6 (64GB) at Rs 55,900, it is now selling for Rs 48,000 – within a span of four months. Even the LG G4 for that matter – launch price was Rs 51,000 for the 32GB variant, which is now down to Rs 46,000 within just a month of launch. HTC One M9+ 32GB variant was launched at Rs 52,500 in April – its current price is Rs 39,999. Need yet another example? Well, how about Sony Xperia Z3+ which was launched at Rs 55,990 for the 32GB variant earlier this month and is already selling for Rs 51,500 on e-commerce sites.

While price drops are a given in the Android eco-system, the iOS sporting Apple iPhones do manage to command high prices for phones launched even a generation ago. The iPhone 5s still sells for Rs 36,000 for the 16GB variant. Since there is no alternative in that space, we cannot really compare lest it become an apples and oranges comparison.

Sales model

Another common feedback from big brands is that their sales channels are different from the online flash-sale model of the Chinese brands. Distribution and marketing costs, and the multiple duties are another reason why the price is higher. But no one has stopped these brands from adopting a different approach, to cut down on the prices. In a country such as India, value for money is still the number one factor for majority of the consumers. Sure if you are getting an exceptionally good product, with exceptionally stand out features which demand the high price point – by all means the price is justified. A lot of you would even say that this is highly subjective, and it is. But if you are getting a similar specced phone which features good build quality at less than half the price – why would you want to pay such a high premium? We all are well aware that the life-cycle of a smartphone is under a year, before it gets outdated.

'But we have phones selling at affordable price points'

This is another oft repeated platitude. Sure companies such as Samsung, LG, Sony, HTC have phone across a price range, but that is not the point. Flagship phones certainly should command a high price point, but shouldn't there be a ceiling? Till Xiaomi and OnePlus started selling their phones at cost price, most of us were under the assumption that the big companies are justified in their pricing given their 'brand value'. But if the last one year is any indicator – that myth has been busted and how! The definition of affordable price point with regards to features differs with every brand.

Big corporations – multiple manufacturing interests – more incentives

Samsung, LG, Sony are huge corporations which not only make phones but a host of other product categories. But let us stick to the smartphone category. Each of the companies mentioned has an advantage over other smartphone makers – Samsung makes display, memory, chipsets; LG makes displays; Sony is the leader when it comes to smartphone camera sensors. Other phone makers have to pay these companies for the said parts. All the more reason for these brands to cut down on their flagship prices. But over the years we have just seen their flagship price points scale more peaks.

curvedsensor1

curvedsensor1

Sony is a market leader when it comes to smartphone camera sensors

These factors surely make one ponder over the pricing factor. Before its launch, OnePlus 2 price was being rumoured to be in the $450 region and there was even a listing on Oppomart at Rs 31,700, which we thought still made a lot of sense over the Rs 50,000 plus price point that most flagships launch at. OnePlus proved us wrong by launching the phone at Rs 24,999 for the 64GB variant with new features.

Will this get the bigger brands out of their slumber when it comes to their flagship smartphone pricing strategies? Or will we continue to see base models of flagship Android phones going over Rs 60,000 in the next round of launches?

OPO2 comparison

OPO2 comparison

Just look at the chart above and the prices. Do you still feel that the launch prices over Rs 50,000 are justified?

Let us know in the comments section.

Tags: OnePlus 2, OnePlus 2 launch, OnePlus 2 price India, OnePlus 2 vs LG G4, OnePlus 2 vs Samsung Galaxy S6, OnePlus 2 vs Sony Xperia Z3+


Source: Will the OnePlus 2 make more expensive Android phones obsolete?

Monday, July 27, 2015

Next-gen Android One phone launches in India for $176

Google's Android One hardware partners are beginning stage two of the low-cost phone strategy: Say hello to the Lava Pixel V1.

The Android One handset launched online in India on Monday for ₹11,350, which works out to $176.71. And for under two-hundred dollars the Pixel V1 in some ways rivals smartphones that arrived just two years ago for much more money.

lava-pixel-v1-front-and-back.jpg

Running Android 5.1 Lollipop, the dual-SIM 3G Pixel V1 is powered by a 1.3 GHz quad-core chip made by MediaTek and is paired with 2 GB of memory. There's 32 GB of on-board storage and the capacity can be expanded by another 32 GB with a microSD card.

Lava says even though the Pixel V1 has 5.5-inch display, the phone feels like a model with a 5-inch screen because it's not very wide. Don't expect a full HD screen though: At this price, you're looking at 1280 x 720 resolution.

There's also some compromise on the camera sensors. Lava advertises the phone as having a 13 megapixel rear camera and an 8 megapixel front camera but those numbers are boosted by software enhancements; the actual sensors are 8 and 5 megapixel models. The rear sensor does have an f/2.0 aperture and 1.4 micron pixels, however, which should allow for solid low-light photos.

Aside from the hardware and appealing off-contract price, the software has a key benefit. Since the phone is certified for the Android One program, software updates are directly controlled by Google, similar to the company's Nexus line of phones. That means there's no or little waiting to get the latest version of Android installed.

Having launched last September, Google's Android One program hasn't yet made a major impact on the smartphone market.

The strategy, however, is sound: Work with hardware partners in upcoming and emerging markets to offer high-value handsets that aren't saddled with carrier control. It's too soon to say if the approach is going to be a success but Google and its partners are on the right track.

Other Android partners can surely offer less expensive phones that have more capabilities, but none of them can provide the software update benefits of Android One.


Source: Next-gen Android One phone launches in India for $176

Sunday, July 26, 2015

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 vs Kyocera Brigadier : Comparison of Features and Specification

New Delhi, Sun, 26 Jul 2015 NI Wire

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 is the smartphone from Samsung with 4.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 480 x 800 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, June.

Kyocera Brigadier is the smartphone from Kyocera with 4.5 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, July. Screen of the phone comes with Sapphire crystal glass protection.

Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 and Kyocera Brigadier. Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 device comes with Li-Ion 1500 mAh battery. This phone is powered with Dual-core 1.0 GHz processor which gives maximum performance. While Kyocera Brigadier device comes with Non-removable Li-Ion 3100 mAh battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 processor which gives maximum performance.

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 phone comes with 4 GB, 512 MB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 64 GB.

Kyocera Brigadier phone comes with 16 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 32 GB.

The primary camera of Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 is 5 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, face/smile detection, panorama.

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: VGA.

The primary camera of Kyocera Brigadier is 8 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, face detection, panorama.

Kyocera Brigadier phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 2 MP.

Main Features comparison of the devices Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 and Kyocera Brigadier.

Touch

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 480 x 800 pixels (Approximately 233 ppi pixel density) resolution.

Kyocera Brigadier provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 720 x 1280 pixels (Approximately 326 ppi pixel density) resolution.

BatteryBattery of the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 is Li-Ion 1500 mAh.Battery of the Kyocera Brigadier is Non-removable Li-Ion 3100 mAh.

DisplayDisplay size of the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 is 4.0 inches and display resolution is 480 x 800 pixels pixels.Display size of the Kyocera Brigadier is 4.5 inches and display resolution is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels.

OSThe mobile device Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat). Whereas Kyocera Brigadier runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat).

ProcessorSamsung Galaxy Ace 4 is powered with Dual-core 1.0 GHz processor. Whereas Kyocera Brigadier comes with Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 processor.

Storage

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 device comes with the 4 GB storage supported model(s).

Kyocera Brigadier device comes with the 16 GB storage supported model(s).

Camera

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 comes with Primary camera is of 5 MP and the second camera is of VGA.

Primary camera is of 8 MP and the second camera is of 2 MP in the device Kyocera Brigadier.

Check the full specification of Samsung Galaxy Ace 4.

Check the full specification of Kyocera Brigadier.

Check Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 vs Kyocera Brigadier : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


Source: Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 vs Kyocera Brigadier : Comparison of Features and Specification

Saturday, July 25, 2015

LG Max for Rs 10990 has 5MP selfie camera, Android Lollipop OS and 5-inch screen

The relatively new LG Max which was launched in India just today, also goes by the name Bello II and Prime II in other countries. The smartphone was expected to be released on these shores in late July and sure enough, it has arrived. Considering the features it has to offer, it carries a ridiculous price tag of Rs 10990. LG clearly thinks its brand name is enough to convince people to shell out more for it.

The thing is, the Indian market is full of better mid-range options that can be bought at lower rates. It's not so much the cost of the LG Max as the specifications which will leave folks thinking of it as a bad deal. The smartphone comes with a 5-inch display of only 854 x 480p resolution and a 1.3GHz quad core processor.

LG Max Smartphone

LG has put 1GB of RAM inside the handset and merely 8GB of memory, in addition to a microSD card slot. The phone is powered by Android Lollipop 5.1.1 and a 2540mAh battery. It's got two SIM card slots and the usual connectivity options like Wi-Fi, GPS and Bluetooth. The South Korean company didn't see the need to send it out with 4G network support.

LG Max Versus Yu Yureka Plus

In LG's own words, 4G technology is still at a 'nascent stage' in India. The LG Max has an 8MP camera on its back panel. Above its screen sits a 5MP 'selfie' lens with a bunch of tricks such as Gesture Shot and Selfie Flash. Overall, the phone is not particularly good looking and gives a weak fight to others like the Yu Yureka Plus and Lenovo K3 Note.

LG Bello 2 Handset

We couldn't find the LG Max being listed by any big eCommerce vendor at the time of publishing this post. But we assume the company will roll it out through offline and online retail channels soon.


Source: LG Max for Rs 10990 has 5MP selfie camera, Android Lollipop OS and 5-inch screen

Friday, July 24, 2015

Microsoft's upcoming flagship Windows Phones leaked!

Specifications on the mysterious "Cityman" and "Talkman" phones and details on what they'll look like

Rumors of new Microsoft flagship phones have been circulating for months now and it's finally beginning to look like they're a real thing that's happening. Earlier this week Satya Nadella announced that official Microsoft flagship phones were on their way, and now today, highly detailed information regarding these devices have appeared on fellow Microsoft news site, Windows Central.

According to the report, these two phones are still going by the codenames, Cityman and Talkman internally (as we reported previously) but are not expected to keep those names once announced later this year, possibly in September at the IFA conference in Berlin, followed by a potential October or November release.

Both devices, which are likely to go by their model numbers, Lumia 950 (Talkman) and Lumia 950 XL (Cityman), possibly skipping the Lumia 940 name altogether, have reportedly had their design heavily influenced by Windows 10 and will both feature an iris scanner for the new Windows Hello function while the larger of the two devices, the Lumia 950 XL / Cityman will feature compatibility with the Surface Pro 3 stylus and a specially designed smart cover, both of which will be sold separately.

Each phone will feature a square Windows symbol on the rear of the device (in identical fashion to the one used for the Surface 3) and the Microsoft name will be prominently displayed above the screen on the front in the same way the Nokia name is used on their current phones. The phones themselves will come in either a matte white or black polycarbonate color variation and the up and down volume keys will interestingly be separated by the phones' power button.

Here's the complete list of leaked specifications for each phone. Keep in mind that while this information is apparently very accurate and does correlate with other rumors we've been hearing, Microsoft has yet to announce any specific details regarding their flagship phones at this time.

Talkman (Lumia 950)
  •     Matte White or black polycarbonate body
  •     5.2 inch WQHD (1440x2560) OLED display
  •     Snapdragon 808, 64-bit Hexa core
  •     Iris scanner (infrared) for Windows Hello
  •     3GB of RAM
  •     32GB of internal storage with a microSD card slot
  •     20MP PureView rear camera
  •     5MP Wide-angle front facing camera
  •     3000 mAh removable battery
  •     Qi wireless charging with flip cover
  •     USB Type-C
  • Cityman (Lumia 950 XL)
  •     Matte White or black polycarbonate body
  •     5.7 inch WQHD (1440x2560) OLED display
  •     Snapdragon 810, 64-bit Octa core
  •     Iris scanner (infrared) for Windows Hello
  •     3GB of RAM
  •     32GB of internal storage with a microSD card slot
  •     20MP PureView rear camera with triple LED flash
  •     1mm silver ring inside the circumference of the black camera pod
  •     Aluminum side buttons
  •     5MP Wide-angle front facing camera
  •     3300 mAh removable battery
  •     Qi wireless charging integrated
  •     USB Type-C
  • Personally I think these two new flagship phones sound awesome but what do you think? Are these specs enough to convince you to upgrade your Windows Phone? Is there something missing that you'd like to see added? What about those codenames? Is it time we moved beyond basic Lumia numbering? Let us know all your thoughts in the comments below and check back soon for more information on Microsoft's new flagship phones as it breaks.


    Source: Microsoft's upcoming flagship Windows Phones leaked!

    Thursday, July 23, 2015

    Lumia Camera For Non-Denim Updated In Windows Phone Store With Transparent Live Tile And Bug Fixes

    Lumia Camera

    Lumia Camera app for non-denim devices got updated to v4.10.0.4 in Windows Phone Store. This is a minor update with support for transparent live tile and bug fixes.

    Lumia Camera Features:

    Lumia Camera is the optimal camera app for your Lumia device.

    Living Images add motion to bring your photos to life in your camera roll and Lumia Storyteller. Any photos and videos you shoot in Lumia Cinemagraph and Lumia Refocus also appear as Living Images, playing as you browse through them in the camera roll.

    Use auto mode when you want to simply point and shoot, or switch to full manual control to create the perfect composition. For action photography, smart sequence is a great way to quickly shoot and combine a series of photos.

    Download it here from Windows Phone Store.


    Source: Lumia Camera For Non-Denim Updated In Windows Phone Store With Transparent Live Tile And Bug Fixes

    Wednesday, July 22, 2015

    Unlocked phone shootout: Meet the Huawei P8 Lite and Oppo R7

    It used to be, not too long ago, that buying an unlocked smartphone online from some unfamiliar Chinese OEM was a sure-fire recipe for frustration. The thing is, the bar for no-contract phones has gotten so high within the past two years or so that you could easily ditch the common flagships down at your local carrier store and live the unlocked life with a great device you've never even heard of. To test that wallet-friendly hypothesis, I took a pair of unlocked Chinese smartphones that either are or soon will be available stateside. Say hello to the $250 Huawei P8 Lite and the $400 Oppo R7.

    Gallery | 29 Photos

    Unlocked phone shootout: the Huawei P8 Lite and Oppo R7

    I'll admit, it might seem a little unfair to compare the P8 Lite to the notably more expensive R7, but the two have more in common than you'd think. Consider the processors thrumming away inside them: They both have octa-core Snapdragon 615 CPUs clocked at 1.5GHz, although the pricier Oppo comes loaded with 3GB of RAM compared to 2GB on the P8 lite. Their AndEBench results bear out those silicon similarities too, as they're basically neck and neck as far as synthetic benchmarks go (though real-world results vary a little) Oh, and both of them obscure Android 4.4.4 -- yes, these are KitKat phones -- almost completely with their own pervasive custom interfaces. That said, the differences here just can't be ignored.

    First up, the P8 Lite. It's a lower-end version of the flagship P8 (which I'm told won't make it to America any time soon). Indeed, you'd have a tough time telling the two apart at first glance. Huawei's design language is applied almost uniformly to both phones, so that the only visual giveaway here comes in the form of a patterned plastic chassis instead of a slick aluminum one. The less-premium construction was one easy way for Huawei to keep costs down. Its choice of screen was another: The P8 Lite has a 5-inch 720p display flanked on all sides by a dark bezel to fool you into thinking it's a bigger edge-to-edge panel. That sort of visual trickery might not be too bad if the actual screen we got was otherwise notable, but really, it's just adequate at best. Colors tended to come off bluer than they should, and everything feels just a little too dim even with brightness cranked all the way up.

    Oh, and despite having some up-to-date silicon powering things, my week saw a few moments of pronounced flakiness; some letters would pop up twice while I was pecking out texts, and other times the space bar didn't seem willing to follow orders. If there was a saving grace, it was the 13-megapixel camera, which offered up solid, mostly pleasant shots -- provided there were enough photons flying around. Things got noticeably dicier when the sun sank behind buildings in the distance, but hey, that's par for the course with low- and mid-range camera modules. All told, the P8 Lite doesn't aspire to much, and it doesn't achieve much either. The screen is fine; performance doesn't leave me hungry for too much more; and the impact on your wallet will be minimal.

    It's pretty neat, then, that the Oppo R7 felt like a natural step up -- the sort of device Huawei could've made if it didn't skimp on the parts so much. It shouldn't have been a surprise that the $400 Oppo R7 felt like a more premium phone, but it was anyway. Bear in mind: My last real experience with Oppo came in the form of the high-end Find 7 series, which felt light and insubstantial because of their all-plastic bodies. Seriously, I can't get over how good this thing feels. The closest analogue I can think of is HTC's old-school Windows Phone 8X, since both phones have edges that taper off to fit neatly in your palm. That's some high praise from yours truly: The 8X is my all-time hand-feel champion. In fact, I'm starting to think Google would do well to give Oppo some Nexus-making responsibilities.

    While Huawei's approach to Android was downright inoffensive, it took me a little longer to get used to Oppo's custom ColorOS interface. Still, the whole thing feels decidedly foreign, from the lack of a separate app launcher to the insistence that users be able to apply loads of cutesy themes. My favorite theme so far? Naturally, the one starring a feisty anime pig (it's apparently one of the month's biggest hits). Meanwhile, swiping to the right from the home screen brings up a fixed panel with dedicated music controls. You can swap this screen out with one devoted to photos if that's more your thing, but I find these extraneous bits mostly useless. Good thing you can kill them entirely.

    Now that I've wrapped my head around it, Oppo's approach feels like the one to beat here. Its Android skin is sleeker, runs better (although that's mostly due to the extra gig of RAM) and still includes plenty of surprisingly smart add-ons. Double-tapping a sleeping screen rouses the phone LG style, for instance, but drawing a circle on it quickly fires up the 13-megapixel camera resting high on the phone's back. Speaking of the camera, most of the photos I took were brighter and more evenly exposed than the ones squeezed out of the P8 Lite, and the more sumptuous 5-inch 1080p AMOLED only helped. Oh, and the pièce de résistance? A built-in GIF mode that does exactly what the name suggests. The R7 also packs an 8-megapixel front-facing shooter (compared to the 5-megapixel module on the P8 Lite), which produced selfies that were more than adequate to appease my awful vanity.

    Throw in a bigger 2,320mAh battery and a VOOC charger that'll take the R7 from bone-dry to fully charged in about an hour and you've got a phone that pulls ahead of the P8 Lite in almost every way that matters. The only real dealbreaker is the cellular radio in the R7: It doesn't support US LTE bands like Huawei's phone does, so you'll be stuck on those HSPA+ airwaves for the foreseeable future.

    So, is it worth $150 more than the P8 with its similar processors and lack of US LTE? If you're considering getting into the unlocked-phone game, there's a decent chance it's because of the cost involved and paying upfront for devices like these is still relatively rare in the states. Still, I'd hesitantly pull the trigger on the Oppo over the Huawei if given the choice: It's more attractive; the camera fires off neater photos; and the battery is made to be a better daily companion. I've lived this past week with only limited access to LTE anyway, and to my utter shock, I didn't really miss it all that much. I know, I'm wondering what the hell happened to me too.

    Edgar Alvarez contributed to this story.


    Source: Unlocked phone shootout: Meet the Huawei P8 Lite and Oppo R7

    Tuesday, July 21, 2015

    New APP Controls Cell Phone Camera for Photos and Video to Produce "Super Selfies" or "Groupies"

  • ⌂Home
  • Mail
  • News
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Weather
  • Games
  • Answers
  • Screen
  • Flickr
  • Mobile
  • More⋁
  • Politics
  • Celebrity
  • Movies
  • Music
  • TV
  • Groups
  • Health
  • Style
  • Beauty
  • Food
  • Parenting
  • Makers
  • Tech
  • Shopping
  • Travel
  • Autos
  • Homes
  • FirefoxTry Yahoo Finance on Firefox »
  • Skip to Navigation
  • Skip to Main content
  • Skip to Right rail
  • 👤 Sign In
  • ⚙ Help
  • Account Info
  • Help
  • Suggestions

  • Source: New APP Controls Cell Phone Camera for Photos and Video to Produce "Super Selfies" or "Groupies"

    Monday, July 20, 2015

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Mon, 20 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is the smartphone from Panasonic with 4.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, September.

    Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is the smartphone from Sony with 8.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1200 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, September. Screen of the phone comes with Shatter proof glass, oleophobic coating protection.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact. Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with Li-Ion 2600 mAh battery. This phone is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance. While Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact device comes with Non-removable Li-Ion 4500 mAh battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with 16 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact phone comes with 16 GB, 3 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    The primary camera of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 20 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1'' sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 1.1 MP.

    The primary camera of Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is 8.1 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama.

    Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 2.2 MP, 1080p@30fps.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact.

    Touch

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1080 x 1920 pixels (Approximately 469 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1200 x 1920 pixels (Approximately 283 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is Li-Ion 2600 mAh.Battery of the Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is Non-removable Li-Ion 4500 mAh.

    DisplayDisplay size of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 4.7 inches and display resolution is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels.Display size of the Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact is 8.0 inches and display resolution is 1200 x 1920 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat). Whereas Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat), upgradable to v5.0.2 (Lollipop).

    ProcessorPanasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor. Whereas Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact comes with Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 processor.

    Storage

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with the 16 GB storage supported model(s).

    Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact device comes with the 16 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 comes with Primary camera is of 20 MP and the second camera is of 1.1 MP.

    Primary camera is of 8.1 MP and the second camera is of 2.2 MP in the device Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact.

    Check the full specification of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1.

    Check the full specification of Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact.

    Check Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Sony Xperia Z3 Tablet Compact : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Sunday, July 19, 2015

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 1030 : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Sun, 19 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is the smartphone from Panasonic with 4.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, September.

    Microsoft Lumia 1030 is the smartphone from Microsoft with 5.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in Exp. announcement 2015, Q1. Screen of the phone comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 4 protection.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Microsoft Lumia 1030. Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with Li-Ion 2600 mAh battery. This phone is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance. While Microsoft Lumia 1030 device comes with Non-removable Li-Ion battery. This device is powered with Quad-core processor which gives maximum performance.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with 16 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    Microsoft Lumia 1030 phone comes with 32 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    The primary camera of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 20 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1'' sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 1.1 MP.

    The primary camera of Microsoft Lumia 1030 is 50 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1/1.2'' sensor size, PureView technology, geo-tagging, face detection, dual capture, panorama, HDR.

    Microsoft Lumia 1030 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 2 MP, 1080p@30fps.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Microsoft Lumia 1030.

    Touch

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1080 x 1920 pixels (Approximately 469 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    Microsoft Lumia 1030 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1080 x 1920 pixels (Approximately 441 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is Li-Ion 2600 mAh.Battery of the Microsoft Lumia 1030 is Non-removable Li-Ion.

    DisplayDisplay size of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 4.7 inches and display resolution is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels.Display size of the Microsoft Lumia 1030 is 5.0 inches and display resolution is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat). Whereas Microsoft Lumia 1030 runs on Microsoft Windows 10.

    ProcessorPanasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor. Whereas Microsoft Lumia 1030 comes with Quad-core processor.

    Storage

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with the 16 GB storage supported model(s).

    Microsoft Lumia 1030 device comes with the 32 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 comes with Primary camera is of 20 MP and the second camera is of 1.1 MP.

    Primary camera is of 50 MP and the second camera is of 2 MP in the device Microsoft Lumia 1030.

    Check the full specification of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1.

    Check the full specification of Microsoft Lumia 1030.

    Check Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 1030 : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 1030 : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Saturday, July 18, 2015

    Buyer's guide: Budget camera phones

    Please suggest a smartphone with a good camera that can be used to shoot pictures that can be shared on social networks, and which also work well with apps like Instagram.

    --Bhushan Kumar, Manish Nagpal, Rahul Sawant, Tareeq Shah

    If your budget under Rs 10,000Consider the Xiaomi Redmi 2 (Rs 5,999) for its responsive cameras and the ability to capture a fair amount of detail in natural light.

    Colours in photos shot with the rear camera are slightly punched up, while the front camera is capable of snapshots that are good enough for sharing online. Its camera app comes with basic modes like HDR for shooting subjects against a bright background and photo filters that you can choose before you take a picture.

    Specifications4.7-inch (1280720p) display1.2GHz Snapdragon 410 quad-core processor1GB RAM5MP, 2MP cameras8GB, microSD2,200mAh battery

    If you prefer a larger screen, then try the Honor 4X (Rs 9,999). Its camera app boasts of features such as Panorama, HDR, au dio note, best photo, and watermark. Notably, it comes with an All-Focus mode that lets you shoot a picture first and later decide on the area of focus. Also, its front snapper comes with a beauty mode for selfies.

    Specifications5.5-inch (1280x720p) display1.2GHz MSM8916 quad-core processor2GB RAM13MP, 5MP cameras8GB, microSD3,000mAh battery

    Under Rs 20,000The cameras on the Asus Zenfone 2 ZE551ML (Rs 19,999) are responsive, take surprisingly crisp shots and perform really well in poorly-lit environments. The camera app comes with a bunch of built-in photo effects that let you create GIF animations, time lapse videos and more.

    Specifications5.5-inch (1920x1080p) IPS display2.3GHz Intel Atom Z3580 quad-core processor4GB RAM13MP,5MP cameras32GB storage, microSD3,000mAh battery

    The Xiaomi Mi 4 64GB (Rs 19,999) cameras come with features like dynamic flash where a photo is taken with and without flash to create a well-lit shot, the option to change focus after yo u take a picture and more.

    Also, this handset's wide-angle front camera shoots pictures that are a lot better than other devices in its price range. We would recommend the 64GB version of this phone to store images and videos, but it is also available in a 16GB (Rs 14,999) variant.

    Specifications5-inch (1920x1080p) display2.5GHz Snapdragon 801 quad-core processor13GB RAM13MP, 8MP cameras16GB, 64GB storage3,080mAh battery

    For a camera phone with a rugged build, opt for the water and dust-proof Sony Xperia M4 Aqua (Rs 20,000). Here, you get an "intelligent" auto mode that figures what scene mode to use and downloadable apps that let you create movies of your albums, a virtual environment around a subject and more.

    Specifications5-inch (1280x720p) display1.5GHz Snapdragon 615 quad-core processor2GB RAM13MP,5MP cameras16GB storage, microSD2,400mAh battery

    Alternatively, you could consider the Microsoft Lumia 640 XL dual-sim (Rs 15,000) Windows Phone, which uses a wide-angle Carl Zeiss lens on its rear camera. Image results are sharp, display good amount of detail and have less grain.That said, image quality suffers a bit in poorly-lit settings.

    Specifications5.7-inch (1920x1080p) IPS display1.2GHz Snapdragon 400 quad-core processor1GB RAM13MP, 5MP cameras8GB storage, microSD3,000mAh battery

    Follow TOI Tech on Twitter >>> @toi_techAnd like us on Facebook >>> TOI_tech

    Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.


    Source: Buyer's guide: Budget camera phones

    Friday, July 17, 2015

    iPhone 6 camera lets travel photographer pack light

    This glacier on the Icelandic coast was photographed with the iPhone 6 and featured in Apple's "Shot on iPhone 6" advertising campaign.

    This glacier on the Icelandic coast was photographed with the iPhone 6 and featured in Apple's "Shot on iPhone 6" advertising campaign.

    This glacier on the Icelandic coast was photographed with the iPhone 6 and featured in Apple's advertising campaign.Photo: Austin Mann

    Cult of Mac's Photo Famous series introduces you to the groundbreaking photographers featured in Apple's "Shot on iPhone 6' ad campaign.

    iPhone 6 camera lets travel photographer pack light

    iPhone 6 camera lets travel photographer pack light

     The thick Icelandic fog lifted and Austin Mann saw an otherworldly glacier emerge. Photography is a way for Mann, a Christian and a professional travel photographer, to worship god, and this was the kind of scene that spoke to him.

    But to get the shot, he would have to leave his camera gear in the car for a climb on all fours down a rocky cliff. Mann put his new iPhone 6 Plus in his pocket and scrambled down to make the picture.

    The shot, taken using the iPhone's panorama mode, was among the most prominent photos featured in Apple's "Shot on iPhone 6' marketing campaign, a promotional blitz that began in the spring with billboards, giant banners stretched across the sides of buildings, and advertising on television and in magazines.

    Austin Mann

    Austin Mann

    Travel photog Austin Mann.Photo: Courtesy of Austin Mann

    Apple mined Flickr, Twitter and Instagram for pictures made by iPhone 6 users around the globe in search of photos that would show off the phone's camera and video capabilities.

    Photos from hobbyists who have only made pictures with the iPhone stand alongside those taken by highly skilled professionals who adopted the iPhone as another tool in their professional kit.

    Even before the Apple campaign, Mann had been sharing his enthusiasm for iPhone cameras. He conducted test shoots with each new model, wrote reviews and did video demonstrations (see one at the end of this post) for his blog. He even invites website visitors to ask him questions on how to make better pictures with the iPhone.

    "Apple has struck a very powerful intersection of high tech and usability," Mann told Cult of Mac. "You put a DSLR in someone's hands for the first time, it can be a very perplexing user experience. Then you have this iPhone and it suddenly simplifies very complex tasks. It empowers everyone."

    Mann, 29, was in Iceland last fall reviewing the new iPhone 6 Plus for his followers. He carried a rig on which he mounted an iPhone 5s and the 6 Plus to compare them side-by-side. Apple selected a second photo from the Iceland trip, a vertical panorama of a towering waterfall, plus a video from the Jökulsárlón Glacial Lagoon. A third photo of Mann's, a snowy slope in Steamboat Springs, Colo., was also featured in the Apple gallery.

    Steamboat Springs, Colo.

    Steamboat Springs, Colo.

    Steamboat Springs, Colo.Photo: Austin Mann

    That Mann would say the iPhone empowers everyone is a clue to his collaborative spirit. He wants his work to start conversations and he is willing to help people see the world with a similar metaphoric intensity.

    He started a company in Dallas, Texas, called WELD, a kind of incubator for creatives in a 10,000-square-foot building that gives independent workers a place to collaborate. He wanted to recapture the spirit of old photo labs, where photographers would discuss their work while waiting for film and prints to dry. He is about to launch a similar space in Nashville.

    As evident by his iPhone tutorials, he is generous with his knowledge. Rather than see photography as a competitive business, Mann believes it to be a language that he excitedly gets to help shape through his pictures and sharing his creative process.

    Mann put the iPhone 6 through its paces in Iceland.

    Mann put the iPhone 6 through its paces in Iceland.

    Mann put the iPhone 6 through its paces in Iceland.Photo: Courtesy of Austin Mann

    "If you look throughout history, 100 percent of the world can understand the visual language of photography, but only a small number can speak the visual language," he said. "The wealthy or the technically trained were the speakers of this language. Today, everyone can speak a visual language. There are few barriers."

    Mann considers himself an early adopter to new technology. As an 11-year-old, he made flyers to promote a lawn mowing business so he could save up $1,300 to buy a Bondi Blue iMac. He became obsessed with Macintosh computers after his father taught him how to use Photoshop.

    He was fascinated with digital imaging, and time he spent scanning basketball cards and making elaborate illustrations eventually led to teaching himself how to build websites. In fact, he devotes a page on his website to his history with Macs, including a timeline that shows every model he ever owned.

    Mann gets a look at one of his iPhone 6 ad shots covering a skyscraper.

    Mann gets a look at one of his iPhone 6 ad shots covering a skyscraper.

    Mann gets a look at one of his iPhone 6 shots covering a skyscraper.Photo: Esther Havens

    In college, Mann converted to Christianity; on evenings when friends would go out to party, he would go out alone with his camera to teach himself how to use ambient light. He also began to see the spiritual side of photography.

    "That was the beginning of photography for me," he said. "l became interested in light and how it fills the darkness. My work became a form of worship for me and I wanted to make people stop and recognize the beauty and splendor of creation."

    That beauty is not limited to landscape photography. Much of Mann's work includes people and their connection to these lands. There's a quality to his work that celebrates the unique values of a certain corner of the world as well as matters of the heart and soul that everyone shares.

    It's part of the reason he loves working with his iPhone. People can see his face because it is not covered by a camera and, likewise, he can see more than what might appear in a DSLR's viewfinder.

    iPhone 6 camera lets travel photographer pack light


    Source: iPhone 6 camera lets travel photographer pack light

    Thursday, July 16, 2015

    Nokia Lumia 530 vs Amazon Fire Phone : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Thu, 16 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Nokia Lumia 530 is the smartphone from Nokia with 4.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 480 x 854 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, July.

    Amazon Fire Phone is the smartphone from Amazon with 4.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, June. Screen of the phone comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 (front and back) protection.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Nokia Lumia 530 and Amazon Fire Phone. Nokia Lumia 530 device comes with Li-Ion 1430 mAh (BL-5J) battery. This phone is powered with Quad-core 1.2 GHz processor which gives maximum performance. While Amazon Fire Phone device comes with Non-removable Li-Ion 2400 mAh battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance.

    Nokia Lumia 530 phone comes with 4 GB, 512 MB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    Amazon Fire Phone phone comes with 32/64 GB, 2 GB RAM and it does not provide support for microSD card slot.

    The primary camera of Nokia Lumia 530 is 5 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1/4'' sensor size.

    Nokia Lumia 530 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: No.

    The primary camera of Amazon Fire Phone is 13 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, HDR.

    Amazon Fire Phone phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 2.1 MP.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Nokia Lumia 530 and Amazon Fire Phone.

    Touch

    Nokia Lumia 530 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 480 x 854 pixels (Approximately 245 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    Amazon Fire Phone provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 720 x 1280 pixels (Approximately 312 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Nokia Lumia 530 is Li-Ion 1430 mAh (BL-5J).Battery of the Amazon Fire Phone is Non-removable Li-Ion 2400 mAh.

    DisplayDisplay size of the Nokia Lumia 530 is 4.0 inches and display resolution is 480 x 854 pixels pixels.Display size of the Amazon Fire Phone is 4.7 inches and display resolution is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Nokia Lumia 530 runs on Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1. Whereas Amazon Fire Phone runs on Amazon Fire OS v3.5 (Android based OS), upgradable to v3.6.5.

    ProcessorNokia Lumia 530 is powered with Quad-core 1.2 GHz processor. Whereas Amazon Fire Phone comes with Quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 processor.

    Storage

    Nokia Lumia 530 device comes with the 4 GB storage supported model(s).

    Amazon Fire Phone device comes with the 32/64 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Nokia Lumia 530 comes with Primary camera is of 5 MP and the second camera is of No.

    Primary camera is of 13 MP and the second camera is of 2.1 MP in the device Amazon Fire Phone.

    Check the full specification of Nokia Lumia 530.

    Check the full specification of Amazon Fire Phone.

    Check Nokia Lumia 530 vs Amazon Fire Phone : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Nokia Lumia 530 vs Amazon Fire Phone : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Tuesday, July 14, 2015

    Guests asked to put smartphones, tablets, cameras away at 'unplugged weddings'

    TORONTO -- Here comes the bride -- and out come the smartphones.

    Wedding guests are often keen to capture all the special moments during a couple's big day. But the flashing glare from cameras, phones and even tablets can prove disruptive during the ceremony -- so much so that some couples are asking their guests to power off their devices.

    Photographer Lainie Hanlon recalled asking a camera-toting wedding guest who was obstructing her view to take a seat -- and she refused.

    "She apparently takes photos on the side as a part-time hobby and I was a very bitter photographer after that because she basically ruined every single ceremony photo that I had," recalled Hanlon, owner of Lainie Hird Photography in Ingersoll, Ont.

    Hanlon said gadget use during ceremonies has worsened in recent years, with guests not only taking smartphone photos but videotaping the entire ceremony.

    She broaches the subject of "unplugged" ceremonies as an option for clients tying the knot.

    "I give them an example: If I'm standing at the altar with the groom and I'm looking down, all I see are cellphones, is that something that you're going to want to see in your photo? Ninety-five per cent of them now say: 'Yeah, you're right, this isn't something that we want.' ... You can't redo a ceremony."

    Stephanie Fusco recalled attending a wedding where a woman was jostling for position with the photographer during key moments of the ceremony. She knew she didn't want to face a similar issue for her own recent nuptials to Michael D'Amico.

    Both of their families and Fusco's close friends were aware of her concerns. She also expressed her wishes and reasons behind an unplugged ceremony in a post on her lifestyle and beauty blog, Leopard is a Neutral.

    Guests wound up taking photos anyway during the ceremony held at a Catholic church in Toronto. But rather than being upset, Fusco said she was "really grateful" for the additional images.

    "I think what I was most concerned about ... was just being distracted by people and people having a bad experience because of people trying to get photos," said Fusco, 26, a social media professional who works in public relations and communications.

    "I think we've all been that guest at a wedding or at an event where you feel like you're watching the whole thing through somebody else's smartphone. And on the day of, I honestly didn't notice."

    Tracey Manailescu, co-founder of The Wedding Planners Institute of Canada, said couples can inform guests in advance that they've opted for an unplugged ceremony. With many couples launching websites as part of their big day, that might be a good place to send a message to guests.

    "Put a note on the program about it as well (stating): 'We would really like you to be in the moment with us and seeing our exchange of love. Please put the cameras away at this time and we promise a lot of photos together afterward,'" said Manailescu.

    Ottawa-based officiants Keith and Lynne Langille have started encouraging couples to opt for unplugged ceremonies, which Keith said now account for about 90 per cent of their weddings.

    Langille said he announces the plans to guests just before the event gets underway, but he does allow them to capture a few quick snaps.

    "We give them 20 seconds at the beginning of the ceremony to go nuts with their cameras, to act like the paparazzi. And in fact, I would say guests get more pictures taken during those 20 seconds than they would had they been popping up throughout the ceremony.

    "The photographers love it because, of course, now they don't have to deal with the problems that they have with guests jumping up and down and getting in their way and flashes going off at the same time. But the guests feel more comfortable doing it because we've encouraged them to do it. And then they sit down, they relax and they enjoy what is an awesome ceremony."

    Do you think asking people to unplug at weddings is OK?
    Source: Guests asked to put smartphones, tablets, cameras away at 'unplugged weddings'

    Monday, July 13, 2015

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus vs Nokia Lumia 530 : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Mon, 13 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus is the smartphone from with 5.5 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in Exp. announcement 2015, Q3. Screen of the phone comes with To be confirmed protection.

    Nokia Lumia 530 is the smartphone from Nokia with 4.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 480 x 854 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, July.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus and Nokia Lumia 530. Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus device comes with battery. This phone is powered with Dual-core Cortex-A57 & quad-core Cortex-A53 processor which gives maximum performance. While Nokia Lumia 530 device comes with Li-Ion 1430 mAh (BL-5J) battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 1.2 GHz processor which gives maximum performance.

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus phone comes with 32 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for To be confirmed.

    Nokia Lumia 530 phone comes with 4 GB, 512 MB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    The primary camera of Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus is 16 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, Auto HDR, panorama.

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 5 MP.

    The primary camera of Nokia Lumia 530 is 5 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1/4'' sensor size.

    Nokia Lumia 530 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: No.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus and Nokia Lumia 530.

    Touch

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.

    Nokia Lumia 530 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 480 x 854 pixels (Approximately 245 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus is .Battery of the Nokia Lumia 530 is Li-Ion 1430 mAh (BL-5J).

    DisplayDisplay size of the Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus is 5.5 inches and display resolution is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels.Display size of the Nokia Lumia 530 is 4.0 inches and display resolution is 480 x 854 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus runs on Android OS, v5.0.2 (Lollipop). Whereas Nokia Lumia 530 runs on Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1.

    ProcessorSamsung Galaxy S6 Plus is powered with Dual-core Cortex-A57 & quad-core Cortex-A53 processor. Whereas Nokia Lumia 530 comes with Quad-core 1.2 GHz processor.

    Storage

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus device comes with the 32 GB storage supported model(s).

    Nokia Lumia 530 device comes with the 4 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus comes with Primary camera is of 16 MP and the second camera is of 5 MP.

    Primary camera is of 5 MP and the second camera is of No in the device Nokia Lumia 530.

    Check the full specification of Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus.

    Check the full specification of Nokia Lumia 530.

    Check Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus vs Nokia Lumia 530 : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Samsung Galaxy S6 Plus vs Nokia Lumia 530 : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Sunday, July 12, 2015

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Sun, 12 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is the smartphone from Panasonic with 4.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, September.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM is the smartphone from Microsoft with 5.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2015, March. Screen of the phone comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM. Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with Li-Ion 2600 mAh battery. This phone is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance. While Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM device comes with Li-Ion 3000 mAh battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor which gives maximum performance.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with 16 GB, 2 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM phone comes with 8 GB, 1 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    The primary camera of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 20 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1'' sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection.

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 1.1 MP.

    The primary camera of Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM is 13 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1/3'' sensor size.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 5 MP, 1080p.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 and Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM.

    Touch

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 1080 x 1920 pixels (Approximately 469 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 720 x 1280 pixels (Approximately 259 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is Li-Ion 2600 mAh.Battery of the Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM is Li-Ion 3000 mAh.

    DisplayDisplay size of the Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is 4.7 inches and display resolution is 1080 x 1920 pixels pixels.Display size of the Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM is 5.7 inches and display resolution is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 runs on Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat). Whereas Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM runs on Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1 with Lumia Denim.

    ProcessorPanasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 is powered with Quad-core 2.3 GHz Krait 400 processor. Whereas Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM comes with Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor.

    Storage

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 device comes with the 16 GB storage supported model(s).

    Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM device comes with the 8 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 comes with Primary camera is of 20 MP and the second camera is of 1.1 MP.

    Primary camera is of 13 MP and the second camera is of 5 MP in the device Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM.

    Check the full specification of Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1.

    Check the full specification of Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM.

    Check Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Panasonic Lumix Smart Camera CM1 vs Microsoft Lumia 640 XL LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Saturday, July 11, 2015

    Amazon Fire Phone vs Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification

    New Delhi, Sat, 11 Jul 2015 NI Wire

    Amazon Fire Phone is the smartphone from Amazon with 4.7 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2014, June. Screen of the phone comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 (front and back) protection.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM is the smartphone from Microsoft with 5.0 inches screen and the resolution of the screen is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels. Phone was announced in 2015, March. Screen of the phone comes with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection.

    Here we are taking about comparison of the features and specification of the devices Amazon Fire Phone and Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM. Amazon Fire Phone device comes with Non-removable Li-Ion 2400 mAh battery. This phone is powered with Quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 processor which gives maximum performance. While Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM device comes with Li-Ion 2500 mAh battery. This device is powered with Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor which gives maximum performance.

    Amazon Fire Phone phone comes with 32/64 GB, 2 GB RAM and it does not provide support for microSD card slot.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM phone comes with 8 GB, 1 GB RAM and it provide support for microSD, up to 128 GB.

    The primary camera of Amazon Fire Phone is 13 MP and the specification of the primary camera is Geo-tagging, HDR.

    Amazon Fire Phone phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 2.1 MP.

    The primary camera of Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM is 8 MP and the specification of the primary camera is 1/4'' sensor size.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM phone comes with a front camera and its specification is: 1 MP, 720p.

    Main Features comparison of the devices Amazon Fire Phone and Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM.

    Touch

    Amazon Fire Phone provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 720 x 1280 pixels (Approximately 312 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM provide the support for multi-touch and the screen comes with 720 x 1280 pixels (Approximately 294 ppi pixel density) resolution.

    BatteryBattery of the Amazon Fire Phone is Non-removable Li-Ion 2400 mAh.Battery of the Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM is Li-Ion 2500 mAh.

    DisplayDisplay size of the Amazon Fire Phone is 4.7 inches and display resolution is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels.Display size of the Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM is 5.0 inches and display resolution is 720 x 1280 pixels pixels.

    OSThe mobile device Amazon Fire Phone runs on Amazon Fire OS v3.5 (Android based OS), upgradable to v3.6.5. Whereas Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM runs on Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1 with Lumia Denim.

    ProcessorAmazon Fire Phone is powered with Quad-core 2.2 GHz Krait 400 processor. Whereas Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM comes with Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 processor.

    Storage

    Amazon Fire Phone device comes with the 32/64 GB storage supported model(s).

    Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM device comes with the 8 GB storage supported model(s).

    Camera

    Amazon Fire Phone comes with Primary camera is of 13 MP and the second camera is of 2.1 MP.

    Primary camera is of 8 MP and the second camera is of 1 MP in the device Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM.

    Check the full specification of Amazon Fire Phone.

    Check the full specification of Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM.

    Check Amazon Fire Phone vs Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification in detail..


    Source: Amazon Fire Phone vs Microsoft Lumia 640 LTE Dual SIM : Comparison of Features and Specification

    Friday, July 10, 2015

    Xolo launches Black smartphone at Rs 12,999; 5.5-inch full HD display, dual rear cameras

    Posted on: 05:37 PM IST Jul 10, 2015 | Updated on: 5:43 pm,Jul 10,2015 IST

    New Delhi: Xolo, the smart devices brand under Lava International, unveiled a new smartphone sub-brand named Black in an exclusive partnership with e-commerce giant Flipkart at a price of Rs 12,999.

    The phone will be available for purchase on the e-commerce site starting July 13.

    The phone will be available for purchase on Flipkart starting July 13.

    "The online smartphone market in India is growing manifold, driven by the digitally-smart generation for whom experience matters. Black is designed to cater to this segment, promising great smartphone experience that goes beyond just the specs," Vishal Sehgal, co-founder and director, Lava International (promoter of Xolo and Lava brands), said.

    "With every product under Black, we aim to deliver a fresh design approach with future ready technology that is backed by full potential of the hardware, complemented with our proprietary customised software platform Hive," he added.

    The new smartphone, which runs on a second generation 64-bit octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 and a 2 GB DDR3 RAM, will come with an updated version of the Hive user interface (UI) named Hive Atlas which is built on Android Lollipop.

    The new updates in the Hive UI will enable users to use an underground mode that provides a secure space for storing private apps and data. While the reading mode enables the device to double up as an e-book reader, the pre-installed Comet browser promises to deliver desktop-like browsing even in weak network areas and save battery and data.

    Also, the device will feature a 5.5-inch full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI. The screen uses a technology called OGS which fuses the screen components to make the touch better and makes the display brighter. It will also come with Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection both in front and in the rear of the phone.

    In terms of storage, the device will come with a 16 GB internal storage expandable up to 32 GB via a microSD slot. The phone, which will support 4G LTE, comes with a hybrid dual-SIM slot.

    Interestingly, Xolo has also introduced two-rear cameras on the phone which aims to copy the imaging system of the human eye. The dual rear camera module uses a combination of a 13 megapixel and a 2 megapixel camera set-up. The front shooter is a 5 megapixel unit. The device is integrated with Adobe Photo Studio in the image gallery, providing a host of editing features which allow users to play with the images taken, using various filters.

    The device also has been pre-tuned with popular, select headsets from JBL, Skull Candy, Creative, Panasonic and Sennheiser. It will feature a 3200 mAh battery which is augmented to deliver 20 percent more power and supports faster charging.


    Source: Xolo launches Black smartphone at Rs 12,999; 5.5-inch full HD display, dual rear cameras

    Thursday, July 9, 2015

    LG G4 Beat: a mid-tier phone with a flagship heritage

    lg-g4-beat-rear.jpgThe G4 Beat won't have a leather option like the G4. PHOTO BY HJK

    The LG G4 is a flagship smartphone, packed with flagship features. It has a quad-core processor, a 5.5-inch, 2,560 x 1,440-pixel Quad HD display and it even has a high-grade leather rear cover. Of course, all that adds up to a flagship price: around $600/£450/AU$929. So what if you're after a phone with similar style and features, but you're not keen on paying a premium price?

    Enter the LG G4 Beat, a mid-tier variant of the G4 that's been designed for more budget-conscious users.

    The newly announced Beat is more compact than the standard G4, sporting a 5.2-inch, 1,920 x 1,080-pixel LCD screen, tipping the scales at 139g or 4.9oz. It's running a Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 processor and has 1.5GB of RAM, half that of the G4.

    Other key differences are a smaller battery -- 2,300mAh compared to 3,000mAh -- and just 8GB of storage. It won't have a leather option, but you do get three colour choices for the Beat's plastic case : silver, white or gold.

    lg-g4-beat-camera.jpglg-g4-beat-camera.jpgThe G4 Beat has a 5MP camera (13MP in Latin America). PHOTO BY HJK

    The rear camera is 8-megapixel unless you're in Latin America, which gets the same 13-megapixel as the G4 for some reason, but it's a 5-megapixel front camera no matter where you're shopping. The rear camera has the same Laser Auto Focus that LG has put in the G4 and the G3 before that. Manual Mode also makes an appearance for anyone who likes to get a little more control over their smartphone photos. Video-wise, you can record in Full HD 1080p.

    The G4 Beat will come with Android Lollipop (5.1.1) installed, and it offers 4G LTE connectivity. You're also getting the standard run of 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.1 and NFC.

    The G4 Beat is shipping this month to some very select markets in Europe and Latin America "including France, Germany and Brazil" according to LG. After that, the company will begin rolling it out to other markets, such as Canada, India, Russia, Singapore, South Africa and Turkey.

    We don't have any p ricing or exact dates yet, with LG saying that it will announce those details "locally at the time of launch."

    lg-g4-beat-full-range.jpglg-g4-beat-full-range.jpg


    Source: LG G4 Beat: a mid-tier phone with a flagship heritage

    Wednesday, July 8, 2015

    The “I Want a Good Phone for Rs 10,000 ($150)” Guide!

    "I want a good smartphone. My budget is Rs 10,000. What do you suggest?"

    That is a query that we have been hearing increasingly of late, thanks in no small measure to the profusion of devices that have arrived in the market with decent hardware, good software and surprisingly low price tags. A few years ago, getting a smartphone for under Rs 10,000 (~$150) meant cutting a few spec and performance corners – the displays might not be that good, the processor might be a tad shabby, the cameras mediocre and so on. Today, however, it is possible to get a device that ticks most hardware and software boxes. And still does not get into five figure territory, as far as Rupees go. And we are not talking of ancient devices but relatively recent phones, all launched within the last year or so – the Xiaomi Redmi 2, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G, the YU Yureka, the YU Yuphoria, the Moto E (2nd generation), the Lenovo K3 Note, the Coolpad Dazen 1, the Lenovo A6000 Plus, the Lenovo A7000, the Microsoft Lumia 640, the Micromax Canvas Doodle 4, the An droid One series…and a few others besides.

    best-smartphones-under-10000

    Hence that question at the very beginning, as the Indian consumer graduates to a problem of plenty. It is a pleasant problem, but it is a problem nevertheless – from limited budgets and limited options to limited budgets and many more options.

    We could have attempted to address this by simply posting a cumulative, comparative spec sheet, but then specs do not always tell the complete tale, do they? So we decided to take a question and answer and use-case-scenario based approach, working out which device(s) would be best for which scenarios. So if you are in the market for a good phone and have a budget that stretches not beyond Rs 10,000, go right ahead and figure out what meets your needs:

    Forget everything else. I just want the best hardware. What is the best option of the lot here?

    Lenovo K3 Note

    We would say that that is going to be a tight call between the recently released Lenovo K3 Note (Rs 9,999) and the YU Yureka (Rs 8,999). The K3 Note is – at the time of writing – the only device with a full HD display below the Rs 10,000 price point. The Yureka cannot match it in that department (it has a 5.5 inch display too but a 720p HD one), but where it will steal a march from the K3 Note – and the other devices in this list – is in packing in perhaps the most powerful processor at this price point: the 64-bit octa core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 (the MediaTek 6752 on the K3 Note runs up good benchmark scores but is considered inferior by many). Android Lollipop, 2 GB RAM, 16 GB storage, 4G support, and 13.0-megapixel front facing and 5.0-megapixel rear facing cameras are the specs both devices share. The K3 Note does have a bigger battery at 3000 mAh (the Yureka has 2500 mAh), but then the Yureka comes with Cyanogen, one of the fastest and smoothest working versions of Android (yes, we know the question revolves around hardware but good software can make a significant difference to performance, and Cyanogen is very good indeed). In terms of looks and sound, the K3 Note is a step ahead, but then, the Yureka costs Rs 1,000 lesser. A tough choice, but if hardware is your fetish and your budget is restricted to Rs 10,000, these two are your best options.

    coolpad dazen x7

    If your budget is super tight and every penny spent hurts, then it is the Coolpad Dazen 1 or the Xiaomi Redmi 2 for you, both of which are available for Rs 5,999 (the Redmi 2 got a price cut recently). The Dazen 1 comes with a 5.0-inch 720p HD display, powered by a quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 processor with 2 GB RAM, with 4G support and a 8.0-megapixel rear camera and a 5.0-megapixel front camera. The Redmi 2 is a more compact proposition, with a 4.7 inch 720p display, and sports the same processor, albeit with lesser (1 GB) RAM and 8 GB storage, which is expandable, as well as with 4G support. Both run Android 4.4, which is a tad old, but but for those wanting good hardware at a rock bottom price, they are both very good propositions. Hardware lovers will prefer the Dazen 1 but those looking for a good display and camera will be better served by the Redmi 2.

    I just want a very good looking device, which works well. Which one do I go for?

    Looks are not the forte of all the devices in this list. Barring one. The YU Yuphoria (Rs 6,999) might look like a copy of Lumia devices of the past but what cannot be denied is that its metal frame, jet black front and spherical camera unit are attention grabbers. It is in fact, the only prominent device in this category that rests on an aluminum frame. The white model with a gold colored frame is a looker. The design might seem familiar, but what the heck, the phone is still a looker. Importantly, it handles most basic tasks well and as long as you do not push into high-defintion gaming will keep ticking over nicely, courtesy its Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 processor backed up by 2 GB RAM. Want an alternative? Wait for the yellow (special) edition of the Lenovo K3 Note (Rs 9,999)!

    I want a great touchscreen experience with a good display. The best option?

    This gets to be a three legged race – on paper, there is none that matches the 5.5 inch full HD display of the Lenovo K3 Note (Rs 9,999). However, bring brightness and color into the equation and you will see the Redmi Note 4G and the Huawei Honor 4x (Rs 9,999) come into consideration, both of which sport 5.5 inch displays of 720p HD resolution. Asked to choose between the two, we would perhaps go for the Redmi Note 4G (now for Rs 7,999). In terms of pure touch experience, we think the Redmi Note 4G is one of the most responsive we have used in this price point – MIUI helps, we suspect.

    I want a great camera. Is that possible in a phone below Rs 10,000?

    Huawei-Honor-4X

    A year ago, it wasn't. Now, it very much is. We would say that in the sub-Rs 10,000 belt, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G (Rs 7,999) and the Huawei Honor 4X (Rs 9,999) both boast very good 13.0-megapixel rear cameras and good front facing ones too – the one on the Redmi Note even tries to guess your gender and age (with occasionally entertaining results). If we had to pick one of the two, we would go with the Honor 4X, because its colors seemed more realistic and it captured just a but more detail than the Redmi Note 4G, which delivered slightly oversaturated colours (they do look good though!). At this point, we do also think that the InFocus M2 deserves a mention – no, it is not a barnstormer of a phone in terms of overall performance and its specs might seem modest as compared to the Redmi Note 4G and the Honor 4X (4.2 inch HD display, 1.3 GHz MediaTek processor, 1 GB RAM), but to get two very decent 8.0-megapixel cameras with flashes (yes, for both!) for as little as Rs 4,999 i s quite a deal in our opinion. And as we said earlier, those cameras are not for decoration – they actually work quite well.

    It's all games and apps for me – and I want the latest OS too. Which phone below Rs 10,000 do you recommend?

    This is pretty much a gimme for the YU Yureka (Rs 8,999). The Snapdragon 615 processor with 2 GB RAM lets it handle pretty much any game or app you throw at it. We would have liked a brighter display and perhaps louder sound, but in terms of handling high-end gaming with relatively few lags, this is perhaps the only phone in the range that can do so with a degree of ease (albeit with little extra heating). If sound and display do make a massive difference, we would pick the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4G (Rs 7,999), which is a brilliant performer, although it does tend to lag a bit more in high definition territory.

    Super tight budget? Go for the Coolpad Dazen 1, with its Snapdragon 410 chip, 5.0-inch HD display and 2 GB RAM – for Rs 5,999, it delivers a lot.

    I am the geek. I want the latest OS with regular updates and lots of tweaking options. Is it possible to get something like the Nexus in this price range?

    yureka03

    The Nexus just got pricey, as we realised with the 6. However, that does not mean there are not tweakworthy and multi-featured operating systems in the sub-Rs 10,000 terrain for the geek squad. Android purists will love the Moto E (2nd generation) which at Rs 6,999, delivers pure Android with no overlays.

    But once again if we had to pick one device for regular OS updates as well as the ability to tweak and customise the interface, we would pick the YU Yureka (Rs 8,999), which thanks to Micromax's tie-up with Cyanogen, gets regular updates (the phone got the Cyanogen OS 12 update recently and runs Android Lollipop already). Cyanogen might not seem as attractive and feature rich as Xiaomi's MIUI but it is heaven for those who want to change app icons, launch animations and a whole lot more. The lesser priced YU Yuphoria is a good option too, but the Yureka is by far the superior.

    I love music. I want great sound. That possible at this price point?

    Yes, indeed. And it really is all Lenovo here. If you prefer loudspeaker mode, we would recommend the A6000 Plus (Rs 7,499) with its dual stereo speakers, while if you are the type that has a good pair of headphones, look no further than the Dolby Atmos supporting Lenovo A7000 and K3 Note (Rs 9,999).

    I am a heavy duty smartphone user and need a device whose battery does not let me down and comfortably lasts a day, if not more. Which one would you recommend?

    We have realised that mAh counts are notoriously fickle when it comes to battery life, but if you feel reassured by having a big battery in your device then try the Lava Iris Fuel 60 which packs in a 4000 mAh battery and comes with a 5.0-inch 720p HD display, a quad core MediaTek processor, 1 GB RAM, 8 GB storage and has a very decent 10.0-megapixel rear camera. It was available for Rs 8,500 at some retailers. No, it is not exactly as powerful as the likes of the Redmi Note 4G or the Yureka, but it will last close to a day and a half of heavy use easily.

    If you are looking for a very good combination of performance and battery life, then the contest boils down to a battle between the Redmi Note 4G (Rs 7,999), which has a 3100 mAh battery which easily lasts a day and then some, and the Lumia 640 (Rs 8,999), which has a smaller 2500 mAh battery but thanks to Windows Phone's less draining OS, pulls out as much time on a single charge just as easily. Give the fact that the Redmi Note 4G boasts a much better 13.0-megapixel camera and a brighter 5.5 inch display, our vote goes for it. The Honor 4X (Rs 9,999) which also sees off a day of heavy use easily with its 3000 mAh battery, is also an option worth considering.

    I am not too much into games and apps. Can I just get a phone that handles most basic tasks well – calls, texts, etc. – and is also good at browsing and e-mail?

    lumia 640

    Get those handkerchiefs out, for it is here that the old favourite returns – if all that you seek is a phone that works efficiently and handles basic tasks brilliantly, we must say we cannot look beyond the Microsoft Lumia 640. The phone is retailing for as low as Rs 8,999 in some places and well, its tiled interface works with wonderful smoothness in alliance with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor with 1 GB RAM, and the 5.0-inch 720p display is very good. And call quality and battery life, in best Nokia (now Microsoft, we know!) tradition are very good indeed. There is no outstanding dazzling feature here. Just a lot of consistency for not too much money.

    And if it is basic functionality you seek more than the smartness at an even lower price, do also consider a phone from another golden oldie – the Moto E (2nd generation). Nothing too flash, just solid performance at Rs 6,999.

    What if I am able to stretch my budget a bit beyond Rs 10,000? Just a bit…

    If you can take it all the way to Rs 10,999, we would say that the Phicomm Passion 660 comes into the picture with its full HD display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 processor, 2GB RAM and its 13.0-,megapixel and 5.0-megapixel cameras (we especially like the front facing camera). Stretch it a bit more to Rs 11,999 and the brilliantly designed Meizu M1 Note comes into contention with its 5.5 inch full HD display with the octa core MediaTek 6752 processor, 2 GB RAM and 16 GB RAM.

    We are going to pin you down – if you had ONE phone to recommend below Rs 10,000, which one would it be?

    That is a tough one, but all said and done, we must confess that the force is with the Lenovo K3 Note (Rs 9,999) at the moment, thanks to that full HD display, which marks it out from the competition. But remember, it's yet to be given the full review treatment. The geek squad might get tempted by the hardware and Cyanogen goodness of the YU Yureka (Rs 8,999), though. And for sheer consistency at a fantastic price, we think Xiaomi just made the Redmi Note 4G (Rs 7,999) a very good deal at Rs 7,999. As you can see, this is a problem of plenty here. Heck, it IS a nice problem to have.


    Source: The "I Want a Good Phone for Rs 10,000 ($150)" Guide!